国产午夜福利在线永久视频_影音先锋色网_人与动人物牲交免费观看_超级人妻碰碰碰,肉肉啪啪视频 ,好爽好湿好硬好大免费视频,亚洲无码中出,欧美18videosex性欧美HUSSY,日韩无码不卡视频,天天爽天天爽天天片a久久网,成年人免费在线看黄片

    In accordance with the trademark design registration standards, the following words and graphics shall not be used for trademarks (excerpted from Article 8 1-9 of the Trademark Law)

    1. Identical with or similar to the state name, national flag, national emblem, military flag or medal of the people's Republic of China;

    2. Identical with or similar to the state name, national flag, national emblem, military flag or medal of a foreign country;

    3. Identical or similar to the flag, emblem or name of an intergovernmental international organization;

    4. Identical or similar to the symbols and names of the "Red Cross" and "Red Crescent";

    5. The general name and graphics of the commodity;

    6. Directly indicating the quality, main raw materials, functions, uses, weight, quantity and other characteristics of the commodity;

    7. Ethnic discrimination;

    8. Exaggerated propaganda and deceptive;

    9. Harmful to socialist morality and customs or have other adverse effects.

Recently, I saw a trademark rejected on the grounds that it was similar to other trademarks,

It feels like the end of the designer,

This is rejected,

This is similar,

How to design is not approximate,

What is the approximate standard?

The newly applied trademark design pattern is as follows:

    Similar to class 41 trademarks

    Similar to class 35 trademarks

The above trademarks,

Is it really similar?

I think

Who looks

Everyone is "short-sighted"